The Gallup genealogy is an extremely well researched and documented family line. I think the first genealogy of the family was published in 1896. I think that the majority of documented descendants of the Gallup family descend through John Gallup and Hannah Lake. Hannah Lake was born about 3 July 1621 in North Benfleet, Essex, England and died aft 28 Feb 1680 in Ipswich, Essex Co., MA. She was the daughter of John Lake and Mary/Margaret Reade. She married John Gallup in 1642. I am not sure when she immigrated from England. I have seen the date of 1644 for her father's arrival in New England, but looking at the marriage date of Hannah, I suspect that it must be a bit sooner, because Hannah's oldest child was born in 1644 at the earliest. There is also the date of 1635 that is on her gravestone, which I believe is probably closer to the truth...at least it was most likely before 1640.
Hannah married John Gallup in 1642 at the age of 21. They very quickly started their family. Their children were:
- Hannah Gallup b. 14 Sep 1644 in Boston, MA d. 20 Jan 1724 Norwich, CT m. Stephen Gifford
- John Gallup III b. Sept 1646 Boston, MA d. 14 Apr 1735 Stonington, CT m. Elizabeth Harris
- Esther Gallup b. 24 Mar 1652 New London, CT d. 30 Sep 1717 Taunton, MA m. Henry Hodges
- Benadam Gallup b. Dec 1655 Stonington, CT d. 2 Aug 1727 Stonington, CT m. Esther Prentice
- Christobel Gallup b. 1657 Stonington, CT d. 17 Sept 1754 Plainfield, CT m. Peter Crary
- William Gallup b. 18 Apr 1658 Stonington, CT d. 15 May 1731 Stonington, CT m. Sarah Chesebrough
- Samuel Gallup b. 1659 Stonington, CT d. bef 1687 m. Sarah Chesebrough
- Elizabeth Gallup b. 8 Mar 1662 Stonington, CT d. aft 1726 Westerly, RI m. Henry Stephens
- Mary Gallup b. abt 1664 Stonington, CT d. 1672-1687 Saybrook, CT m. John Cole
- Margaret Gallup b. 1668 Stonington, CT d. 1689 Suffolk, MA m. Joseph Culver
Hannah Lake lost her husband at the Great Swamp Fight at Narragansett Fort, South Kingston, RI on 19 Dec 1675 during King Philip's War and he is buried in a mass grave at the Fort. There are also many other notables of New England families that died in the battle. There were about 70 men who were killed including John Gallup as well as 300 or so of the Narraganeett tribe. Hannah is thought to have died on 28 Feb 1680 and she is buried at Whitehall Cemetery in Mystic, New London Co., CT.
Martha Lake was born about 20 Jul 1627 in North Benfleet, Essex, England. I use the "abt" for many of the births that I see for these old families because most of the dates that we have are not of the actual birth but rather their baptismal which we is what we have as a written record. Martha probably came over with her parents around 1635-1640. Martha married Thomas Harris on 15 Nov 1647. Thomas Harris was the son of Thomas Harris and Elizabeth Hills and probably came over with his parents in 1631 from England. He was born on 25 Apr 1618 in Hatherup, Gloucester, England and died on 2 Aug 1687 in Ipswich, Essex Co., MA. His occupation is listed as Ferryman.
I don't have as much on this family but here is the list of children that I have:
- John Harris b. 7 Jan 1653 Ipswich, MA d. 21 Nov 1732 Ipswich, MA m. Grace Searle
- Elizabeth Harris b. 8 Feb 1654 Ipswich, MA d. 1 Feb 1734 CT m. John Gallup III
- Margaret Harris b. 6 Aug 1657 Ipswich, MA d. 18 May 1750 Ipswich m. John Staniford
- Mary Harris b. 31 Jan 1660 Ipswich, MA d. bef 1696
- Ebenezer Harris b. 1663 Ipswich, MA d. 14 Apr 1751 Plainfield, CT m. Rebecca Clarke m. Christobel Crary (Christobel was the daughter of the above Christobel Gallup and Peter Crary)
- William Harris b. 12 Dec 1664 Ipswich, MA d. 31 Dec 1751 m. Sarah Newman
Martha & Hannah Lake are both my 9th great grandmothers. I descend through Hannah's children John Gallup III and Benadam Gallup and through Martha's daughter, Elizabeth Harris. I haven't untangled as much of the Harris line as I have the Gallup line, but I wouldn't be surprised that there might be more genealogical connections.
Now if you do a little research into Hannah and Martha's ancestry...there is a certainly a surprise or two. If it is correct, their line includes Kings of France, England and Germany going back to at least Charlemagne. Personally, I think anytime you try to go to much past 1600, you run into a lot of trouble with proof.